This morning’s discussion at the Cafe One in Baker Street could not help but include the recent inauguration of the American President.
I was surprised, perhaps I should not have been, how unaware British people appear to be regarding the nature of American democracy. Unlike in Europe, elections in America are often heavily manipulated. In Europe, where most states have proportional representation, manipulation is almost impossible. In England, unlike the rest of Britain, we almost exclusively use the first-past-the-post election method and so manipulation is possible but guarded against by the use of an arms-length boundary commission. Not so in America. The lower house of the America parliament has constituencies and each one elects one member. To protect the incumbent the political parties change the make-up of the electorate. If a neighbourhood votes the “wrong” way it is excluded from the constituency and if it votes the “right” way it is included. Over time this produces constituencies with bizarre shapes. The example below. Illinois district 4, shows a constituency that almost entirely surrounds another one.
This gerrymandering does not affect the election of the America President. However, other methods are used instead. Collectively they are know as voter suppression. The main types of voter suppression are:
- Spurious removal of voters from the electoral role
- Unequal spread of polling stations – poorer areas have fewer stations
- Misinformation for postal voting – making voters miss deadlines
- Unequal polling station opening times
- Unequal voter identification techniques – requiring a driving licence
- Banning convicted criminals for life
- Arduous voting registration requirements
Elmbridge staff put a great effort in trying to get people on to the electoral role. In America there are many organisations that help people to get registered. However, some American organisations do their best to make sure people never get registered or once there try and remove them.
Some American academics have suggested that the total effect of voter suppression in the recent presidential election was sufficient to change the result in the electoral college.