You will have noticed that the upgrading of the paths around Churchfields was completed in May. Not only were these busy paths widened to 3 metres wherever possible to make them safer for all users but the proposals put forward by Cllr Ashley Tilling (for lighting to be installed on the path between the playground and the allotments, to move the fences to provide a much safer s-bend next to the skate park, and for the route into town through the car park to be made good) were all agreed and implemented.
However, a Local Inquiry is to be held at 1000 on the 7th September (venue to be decided) to determine whether the paths should be shared for both cyclists and pedestrians. Written representations should be made by 10th August to Sarah.firstname.lastname@example.org, using the same address to register intentions to attend the inquiry.
To download the details of the Inquiry click on this link: Pre Inquiry noteDPIQ36302110 PIM Note 21 07 21
There has been a significant impact on local businesses over the last year due to closures imposed under covid-19 lockdown rules. This has accelerated an existing trend away from high street shopping to on-line purchasing (32.5% of sales are now on-line). Weybridge has 25 empty retail units and both Santander and Barclays banks have recently announced that they are closing their Weybridge branches.
Elmbridge Borough Council has been administering grants to businesses to cover the time they have been mandated to close. Discretionary grants have been paid to those not mandated to close but who have suffered a large downturn in trade and up to £9000 one-off payments were given in January to retail, leisure and hospitality businesses forced to close in the third lockdown.
The government’s Budget continued both the furlough scheme and the reduced rate of VAT for tourism and hospitality businesses until September, while extending the business rates holiday for three months.
As we emerge slowly from lockdown constraints, the Council will be looking to further support businesses from its own funds. £2000 per business will be available to improve shopfronts and signage and £1000 to support improved footfall or sustainability. Further support is available in the form of a grant of up to £2000 to bring shops that have been empty for over 3 months back into commercial use.
32 independent retailers in Elmbridge have already benefited from a grant of up to £1500 from the Elmbridge Digital High Street Fund to help them convert to selling on-line and 82 start-up awards have been made so far to provide £1000 to set up new businesses.
Further discretionary grants are in the pipeline. Currently there is no detail on these but the following links can be used to check on progress of these grants.
Former Cafe Rouge, Queens Road
At last a Planning Inspector has agreed with a decision of your local councillors with regard to off-street parking provision!
As anyone who lives in Weybridge Riverside or in the triangle near Queen’s road knows, parking spaces for residents are at a premium. This acute pressure on both day and night time parking is known technically as ‘parking stress’.
Councillors Vicki Macleod and Ashley Tilling have long argued that planning permission should not be granted to developments which do not provide adequate off-street parking. The development at the former Grotto pub is a case in point.
More recently, fellow councillors on the committee have agreed with your local councillors and this has led to a number of proposals being turned down because of inadequate parking – for example one in Baker Street and another in South Road. Both of these refusals were turned over by national Planning Inspectors and the developments went ahead, with inadequate parking or indeed in South Road, no parking for residents of the new builds.
In August last year, the local planning committee refused permission on three applications for flats in the old Cafe Rouge building (2020/0265, 0473 and 1288) because of inadequate parking. We were notified on Thursday 1st April that for the first time in our memory (and we don’t think this was an April Fool) the committee’s refusal on the grounds of inadequate parking provision was upheld by the Inspector. In summing up his observations and reasoning, the Inspector said:
“I therefore find that the proposed development would be harmful to residential living conditions through increased parking pressures on nearby local roads. It would conflict with Policy DM7 b) of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan April 2015 which seeks that the proposed parking provision should be appropriate to the development and not result in an increase in onstreet parking stress that would be detrimental to the amenities of local residents.“
This is a major step forward for Weybridge as it now gives Inspectorate backing to our arguments on the need for adequate off-street parking provision to be made for new developments in and near our town centre.
This gives us hope that we may again get Inspector backing in the case of Clive House in Queen’s Road (2020/2438). Here, the planning committee on Wednesday 30th April refused permission for an additional floor to be built on top of the existing building and one of the reasons given for refusal was lack of adequate off-street parking. The second reason for refusal was the harm to the character of the area because of the imposing mass that would be created by adding another floor.
This week, Weybridge has been subjected to a bizarre form of vandalism – cutting down small trees situated on public land.
Councillor Vicki Macleod was alerted to the first in-town instance – on the green in Thames Street – last Wednesday 31st March by a local resident. She spoke with households in Thames Street and posted on the local Facebook group. She also reported the incident to an Elmbridge Officer in the Green Spaces team and was given the crime reference so she could get through to the police directly.
Later on Wednesday another local resident told Vicki he had seen someone leave the green, get in a red car and drive away. It was only on seeing Vicki’s post that he put two and two together. Vicki passed this information on to the local police – Elmbridge Beat – via Facebook Messenger.
Then at 10.40 that evening Vicki was contacted by one of the people she had spoken with earlier who heard sawing, looked out of the window and spotted an individual who got into a car and sped off. He had come back to cut his tree into three pieces!
Sadly, the following day, Friday, reports came in of another tree that had been cut down outside Manor Court. Then on Saturday there was a report of another tree cut down off the Queen’s Road, by the cricket ground and Manby Lodge School and one in Pantile Road near the Oatlands Recreation ground. Police were called to the cricket ground where there was also a noisy gathering. Unfortunately they did not find the perpetrator.
A red car was spotted near the site of tree vandalism on more than one occasion.
It is not certain whether these incidents are linked to the recent felling of trees at Cowey Sale, along the Desborough Cut and in Walton-on-Thames. If you have seen or heard anything suspicious, please contact Elmbridge Beat and state the crime number 45210028887.
Introductory Overview: click here for Part 1
The text below is an extract from a project press release in December and gives more detail on the ambitions for the project as well as an update on NHS changes and the future of urgent care and walk-in services locally.
Among the agreed outcomes of the October stakeholder meeting:
- High quality primary care as an integrated part of broad health and wellbeing offer
- Priority to rehouse the GPs and health care facilities and related services
- Key to bring together health, care, enhanced library, services from Churchfields centre, youth centre, cinema, as well as arts/culture/heritage to create an integrated coherent whole
- Project fits with ambitious plans for the enhanced role of libraries of the future – taking on social, economic, cultural and educational aspects – ‘centres of community’
- Two phase approach can be adopted so new health facilities can come first
- Create integrated, flexible space, open to and involving all sectors of the community: statutory, community and private
- Need to reach out to entrepreneurs and local organisations and find the key people who will use these services and contribute life and longevity to the buildings
- Project is as much about change of culture as construction of new buildings – breaking down silo-type thinking so organisations and authorities and groups really work together as a local team
- Business model must underpin project – not only provide public services but attract entrepreneurs, making spaces people want to go to/use, ensuring economic viability
- High quality design, architecture/landscaping, maybe new town square/plaza
- Project must be guided by environmental/health concerns, climate change and pandemic proofing
Next key step: finalising an outline business case for the health care elements of the project which will next be submitted to NHS England for approval.
Health Care: What Do We Know So Far?
The new health care component will offer a much wider range of services than was previously available, and the project has now determined what some of those will be. The list below is a minimum plan to offer:
- GP services with increased support via online, telephone and video appointments and same day and face-to-face access for those who need it
- Mental health services
- Health hub for delivering community and outpatient services – e.g. counselling, podiatry, physiotherapy
- Diagnostics including X-ray, ultrasound and phlebotomy
- Women’s and children’s hub
- Urgent care service (see below)
- Wider wellbeing services to help people stay healthy and well
The Future of Urgent Care and Walk-in Centres
Key to determining future services in Weybridge is the NHS review of urgent care and walk-in facilities across North West Surrey. This is driven by new national standards for walk-in care, which means it is not possible to replace the former walk-in centre in Weybridge with like-for-like services.
Between January and March 2020, the NHS ran a series of events to test a shortlist of options for how to provide walk-in type services in the future with local people. This included whether or not to house an Urgent Treatment Centre (UTC) in Weybridge. UTCs are GP-led (rather than nurse-led), open for a minimum of 12 hours a day – from 8 am-8 pm, able to provide diagnostics (such as X-ray, blood and urine tests) and able to provide some bookable appointments from NHS 111.
The NHS is able to progress plans for the wider range of services to be available from the new Weybridge facility whether a UTC is part of the final site plan or not. Flexibility is key for the new site in any case, and a shortlist of options is now being reviewed in light of changes in how patients access care and revised guidance from NHS England. Should this result in a proposal to materially change the provisioned walk-in centre services across North West Surrey, a full public consultation would follow.
The COVID-19 pandemic has of course accelerated a pre-existing shift towards use of digital services. In the long term the NHS anticipates this will continue, as it also plans safe services that limit the volume of people gathering in surgeries, clinics and hospitals.
Surrey County Council has decided to pilot “School Streets”. A school street is where the road outside a school is closed to motor vehicles during school drop-off and pick-up times.
In practice, this means the road is closed twice a day for 30 to 60 minutes. The restriction usually applies to both school traffic and through traffic. Exemptions are made for residents living in that street and for blue badge holders.
Surrey hopes that the pilots will encourage active travel, improve air quality and promote road safety. School streets are also effective for enabling social distancing outside schools. Surrey County Council has approved the principle of a school street pilot at Heath End School in Farnham and is inviting nominations for other school streets elsewhere in Surrey.
There are also plans to measure air quality around a sample of schools in all eleven Surrey districts and boroughs. The measurement would be at child-head height to identify the level of air pollution children are being exposed to at school drop-off and pick-up.
School streets started in Italy in 1989 and were first introduced to the UK in 2015 when schemes began in Scotland. Camden was the first site in London in 2017. Today there are over 130 school streets in Britain.
Evaluations have shown that motorised traffic not only decreases on the school street where the scheme has been implemented, but also on surrounding streets. This suggests a change in behaviour with people swapping mode of transport to active travel.
It remains to be seen whether residents in Weybridge would welcome the introduction of school streets in our town. Queuing traffic is a frequent feature of life in Weybridge and some may fear school streets would create more problems. It very much depends on the layout and context of each individual location. Please let us know what you think.
If you would like more information about School Streets it is available at www.schoolstreets.org.uk
Many residents of Weybridge are beset by difficulties in finding space to park their cars, especially in some of the older streets around Weybridge town centre. To alleviate this difficulty some streets have sought and been granted on street parking controls, and these residents usually find themselves paying Surrey County (SCC) for a Resident’s Parking Permit.
Currently, and bizarrely, Surrey Highways is now consulting Weybridge residents on a proposal to introduce on street parking controls in two roads where there is no on-street parking congestion.
There is no highways reason for the scheme that has been proposed for Wey Road and Round Oak Road:
- there is very little on-street parking in these roads, so no need for restrictive controls;
- most houses and flats in these roads have ample off-street parking space;
- there are no safety issues caused by the small number of cars which do park in these roads.
In short, there is no need for on-street parking controls.
Many of the residents in the two roads concerned do not want this scheme introduced as they have no objection to the small number of cars which do park in these roads. Surrey County Council Elmbridge Local Committee have allowed the scheme to be considered despite the proposal falling outside the normal way of approaching such schemes i.e. via the formal SCC annual review of parking.
The highways officer saw no reason for introducing on-street parking controls, but is bound to put forward a proposal as the Local Committee agreed to consider it. There are other streets in Weybridge that are not being considered despite there being severe parking related congestion.
If you would like to make your views known you can do two things:
- Join the “Wey and Round Oak Road NO CPZ” action group by emailing email@example.com
- Fill in Surrey’s online survey by clicking on this link.
Write your own reason for objection (question eight in the survey) but, in general, the reason is quite simple, parking controls are normally introduced to meet concerns about the four main parking criteria:
- Parking stress
Even a casual observer would recognise that Wey Road does not fall into any of these criteria (except at the entrances which have been dealt with already). That is why the Surrey’s parking officers rejected the proposals outright when they undertook last year’s review.
St Catherine’s, Thames Street: application 2019/0386
PA Housing, who administer the majority of social housing in Elmbridge, made an application last year to demolish the two storey, brick built St Catherine’s House on the corner of Beales Lane and Thames Street and replace it with a part two and part three-storey building for 28 residential dwellings: 9 x 1 bed, 13 x 2 bed and 6 x 3 bed units.
The Area Planning Sub-Committee refused the application on the grounds that its height and mass would harm the character and appearance of the area as well as its adverse effect on traffic flow and increase to parking stress. There were also concerns on overlooking and loss of privacy to houses opposite on Beales Lane. The developer appealed and the Planning Inspector arranged a hearing at which all parties could express their views. The Inspector also visited the site and the surrounding area.
After quite a long wait, we were informed that the appeal was allowed and planning consent given.